Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
theapportioner theapportioner is offline
Mocker
theapportioner's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
theapportioner is probably a spambot
Old May 27th, 2003, 10:02 AM        AFP -- Sharon backtracks on term "occupation"...
Sharon backtracks on term "occupation" in face of internal rebellion

JERUSALEM (AFP) - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon went into damage-control mode after stunning the country and his own party by using the term "occupation" to refer to Israeli presence in the Palestinian territories.

"People did not understand me," a parliamentary source quoted Sharon as saying during a meeting of the committee on defence and foreign affairs.

"Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein called me yesterday and confirmed that the official word used for the territories is 'disputed.'"

Sharon had caused a stir among his own ranks on Monday when he criticised the negative impact on Israel of the military occupation of the Palestinian territories, and already appeared to be regretting his comments.

"I think that the idea of keeping 3.5 million Palestinians under occupation is the worst thing for Israel, for the Palestinians and also for the Israeli economy," he told his fellow Likud MPs on Monday.

"You may not like the word, but what's happening is occupation," he insisted.

Israel's "control over the Palestinians cannot continue without end. Do you want to stay forever in Jenin, Nablus, Ramallah and Bethlehem? That is not right," he said.

Sharon was responding to a barrage of sharp criticism from right-wing Likud members after the cabinet's approval Sunday of the Mideast roadmap for peace, which foresees the creation of a Palestinian state by the end of 2005.

The comments, the softest statements ever known to have been pronounced by the premier, had threatened to further alienate the right-wing parties in his government coalition and the hardliners in his own party.

Shaul Yahalom, a member of the pro-settler National Religious Party, said Tuesday that he was relieved.

"I was in shock yesterday; I feel a bit better today," the sources quoted him as saying.

During the committee meeting, Sharon clarified a number of the reservations he submitted to the United States on the roadmap.

"It would take a miracle for the Palestinians to fulfill the demands listed by Sharon," rejoiced Yahalom, whose party voted against endorsing the peace blueprint on Sunday.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.