Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Ant10708 Ant10708 is offline
Mocker
Ant10708's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Ant10708 is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 04:30 PM        MALE bisexuality does not exist
MALE bisexuality does not exist, psychologists in the US have claimed.

A new study concludes that the large majority of men purporting to be bisexual are actually gay, while the rest are more likely to be heterosexual.

Senior author Michael Bailey, from Northwestern University in Chicago, said: "Bisexual male behaviour certainly exists, but the study suggests that a bisexual orientation, an actual sexual preference for both men and women, does not exist in men. If such men exist, they are certainly very rare and we didn't find them."

Researchers recruited 101 young adult men, 33 identifying themselves as bisexual, 30 straight and 38 homosexual.
Advertisement:

They were questioned at length about their sexuality before being seated alone in a laboratory to watch erotic films while their arousal levels were monitored by a sensor.

Gay men were aroused by images of men, while heterosexual men were aroused by women. But psychologists said those claiming to be bisexual were only aroused by one or the other - 75per cent by men and the rest by women.

Dr Bailey said some men claim to be bisexual as it is easier than admitting to being gay, while others might consider it some kind of achievement and be proud to swing both ways

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117...-13762,00.html
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
Reply With Quote
  #2  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 04:39 PM       
sounds like bullshit to me.
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
GAsux GAsux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Las Vegas
GAsux is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 05:07 PM       
What about prison sex? Are inmates who hump other inmates in prison secretly gay? Just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
sadie sadie is offline
ineffable
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ineffability
sadie is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 05:11 PM       
Quote:
"If such men exist, they are certainly very rare and we didn't find them."
they only recruited 202 guys.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Ant10708 Ant10708 is offline
Mocker
Ant10708's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Ant10708 is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 05:14 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAsux
What about prison sex? Are inmates who hump other inmates in prison secretly gay? Just curious.
Or desperate to have sex with something.

They didn't even recruit 200 men but the sampling of men claiming to be bisexual was pretty high out of the 100 people they used. Who knows if it is true but I found it interesting.
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 05:57 PM       
This study only proves that Chicago is full of fags and wanna-be fags.

Haha just kidding, I don't know anything about Chicago. Go Cubbies!
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Chojin Chojin is offline
was never good
Chojin's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 1999
Chojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contest
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 06:39 PM       
Uh. I'm bisexual and know at least two other guys that are as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
sadie sadie is offline
ineffable
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ineffability
sadie is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 06:43 PM       
shit. and i used a calculator and everything.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Chojin Chojin is offline
was never good
Chojin's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 1999
Chojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contest
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 06:46 PM       
It also I think would depend on the 'images of men' being shown. I find that bisexual guys tend to go for girlier guys (and boyish girls), and if they were showing pictures of hair-covered plumbers (no pun intended ha ha am i right) going at it, I can understand why it'd only appeal to the extremes that can appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Ant10708 Ant10708 is offline
Mocker
Ant10708's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Ant10708 is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 06:49 PM       
That is true. And who knows what a bisexual might enjoy watching porn wise. Two girls going at it? Two guys? Girl and a guy? Two girls and a guy? two guys and a girl? Bisexuals have all the options
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Chojin Chojin is offline
was never good
Chojin's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 1999
Chojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contestChojin won the popularity contest
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 06:50 PM       
Well for what it's worth I only like same-sex porn. :<
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Jeanette X Jeanette X is offline
Queen of the Beasts
Jeanette X's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: in my burrow
Jeanette X is probably a spambot
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 07:32 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chojin
Uh. I'm bisexual and know at least two other guys that are as well.
No you aren't, you're just a gay man in denial or a straight guy who wishes he was bi.

Jeez, didn't you read the article?!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
kahljorn kahljorn is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NO
kahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contestkahljorn won the popularity contest
Old Jul 8th, 2005, 07:44 PM       
Burn.
__________________
NEVER
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Helm Helm is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mount Fuji
Helm is probably a spambot
Old Jul 9th, 2005, 05:29 AM       
I wouldn't call this HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE but yeah, I think some people who claim to be bisexual aren't really biologically urged towards it. Just like a significant part of the people who claim to be gay also have no inherent tendency towards homosexuality. I'm not denying that gay men and women exist, I'm just saying that there are a lot of people, like ziggy said, who pick it up as learnt behaviour, not because they can't help it. People like to pick up labels. I wouldn't be surprized, for example if one were to check a sadomasochist clique only to find that a quantity of the people are aren't really into pain, but rather are so desperate for sex they're willing to do the latex bullshit just so they can get off eventually.

being bisexual makes more sense than being gay from an evolutionary standpoint because it maximizes the chance of one having sex as means to stress-relief while also leaving the chance of mating to create babies ( which is the prime directive and all ) so I guess it would make more sense of people were bisexual than gay. But that's just theorizing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Jul 9th, 2005, 01:25 PM       
That's odd Chojin, because I tend to be attracted to more feminine, shapely women and muscular, ripped men.

And I'm amazed that this thread has no :OAO in it yet. Actually, I'm amazed that :OAO isn't a real emoticon...
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
pjalne pjalne is offline
Mocker
pjalne's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Norway
pjalne is probably a spambot
Old Jul 9th, 2005, 06:41 PM       
Hey there, OAO. How's the weather there up inside your own ass?
__________________
Encyclopedia Obscura
Reply With Quote
  #17  
MLE MLE is offline
CHIEF OF POLICE
MLE's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nice Chinese Restaurant
MLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty okMLE is probably pretty ok
Old Jul 9th, 2005, 07:27 PM       
pjalne:

Ant: it's sheer ignorant to study a very little amount of people, all concentrated in one city, and then to try to claim such a blanket statement as being true. i'm not saying you're the one that originally claimed it, but you're the one that posted it.

it's as ridiculous as claiming that there are no bisexual people that exist.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jul 10th, 2005, 01:50 AM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant10708
Who knows if it is true but I found it interesting.
You into horribly vague reports about seemingly horribly flawed studies? Heh, at the very least it has great argument starting potential, I suppose.

They should have gone into more detail about "arousal levels were monitored by a sensor." Did they just measure increase in pulse, body temperature? If so, how did they rule out embarrasment as a cause for those conditions as opposed to arousal?

That's where I see the biggest flaw in this study. It's even worse than the questionable sampling method.
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Ant10708 Ant10708 is offline
Mocker
Ant10708's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
Ant10708 is probably a spambot
Old Jul 10th, 2005, 02:43 AM       
I got it from the same site I read about the dogs being reanimated like 6 hours after they died. The zombie dogs impressed me so much I came back for more.
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
Reply With Quote
  #20  
ziggytrix ziggytrix is offline
Mocker
ziggytrix's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i come from the water
ziggytrix is probably a spambot
Old Jul 10th, 2005, 04:57 PM       
yeah, i thought it would be fun to post it on the rave music board i'm on and someone said:

Quote:
Holy shit, if you guys knew the crap I had to endure with Michael Bailey and my last job. He wrote a book called The Man Who Would Be Queen which was denounced by the transgender scientific community. He basically said that trans women are either effeminate gay men or bizarrely autosexual paraphilic men. There was a formal investigation done at Northwestern and he had to resign as chairman of the Psychology Department. Add onto this the hundreds of complaints made by leading professionals in the transgender field, I would never take anything he says as scientific "fact." I may be biased because the organization and doctors I worked for were some of the main forces driving the investigation, but if you know the details you'd discard anything Bailey has to say. I pray to god this man stops any research and practice.
__________________
BOYCOTT SIGNATURES!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Skulhedface Skulhedface is offline
Asspunch McGruf
Skulhedface's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: !GNODAB
Skulhedface is probably a spambot
Old Jul 10th, 2005, 07:27 PM       
I think the logic is flawed, roughly for the same reason test audiences ruin good movies.

By their own admittance, they say both that they interviewed and studied roughly 100 men, but also that they theorize a truly bisexual male would be rare if not impossible to find.

Sloppy science, if you ask me. There's too many variables involved... I mean, if you were to ask 100 people in the Bible Belt if God was real, you'd come to the conclusion that "there are no atheists in this world, and it'd be extremely rare if not impossible to find one."

To think people get grants for this shit.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
kellychaos kellychaos is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where I Started But In A Different Place
kellychaos is probably a spambot
Old Jul 11th, 2005, 05:48 PM       
When the sample set is sufficiently high, bullshit drops off toward negative infinity.
__________________

Wherever you go, there you are.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.