Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Nerd Nerd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Nerd is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 10:53 PM        Peak Oil
As I'm sure a lot of you have already read, Peak Oil is apparently, the end of the world as we know it. And it's going to happen very soon.

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/Index.html

Scary, no? Even with all the evidence, I'm still skeptic about the whole thing. But I'd be interested to hear what you all have to say about it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
AChimp AChimp is offline
Resident Chimp
AChimp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Jungles of Borneo
AChimp is probably a real personAChimp is probably a real person
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:01 PM       
Quote:
He stated that fuel cell vehicles would never amount to significant market share. Hydrogen was ruled out as a solution because of intensive costs of production, inherent energy inefficiencies, lack of infrastructure, and practical difficulties such as the extreme cost and difficulty of storage.
Which is exactly what can be said of the situation with gasoline a century ago when automobiles were just making their debut. The change was made, though, because cars were better than buggies.

That website is just a pile of paranoid shit. While it's got a few good bits, it's mostly just a soapbox to advocate reshaping society to fit his vision of everyone living like the Amish.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
El Blanco is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:07 PM       
1) Those problems with hydrogen aren't insurmountable, they just need more research. Hell, we can store it.

2) When exactly did oil and hydrogen become the only 2 fuel sources on earth?
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
DamnthatDavid DamnthatDavid is offline
Puddle Pirate! ARRRR!
DamnthatDavid's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Oregon Dunes.
DamnthatDavid is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:15 PM       
That idiot has no idea what he talking about.

Quote:
Hydrogen was ruled out as a solution because of intensive costs of production
Take a car battery, attach wires to each end, run wires into fishtank. Keep them seperated. See the bubbles? That the splitting of the Hydrogen and Oxygen.

Freaking retard, the most difficult part is harnessing the pure Hydrogen. But that only difficult for home hydrogen makers.
Hell, they where splitting H2O during WW1.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:22 PM       
Ahem, ye unenlightened ones..

1) Hydrogen is not a fuel source. Energy from oil is used to extract hydrogen from water, and the hydrogen is then burned, producing less energy than the conversion process. Fuel cells are an energy storage and transfer medium only. In short, hydrogen has nothing at all to do with the issue.

2) Oil is not the only source of energy we use, but it is the cheapest, most abundant, most technologically viable, and most used. It accounts for a very large percentage of worldwide energy production, and if oil prices rise rapidly no other energy source can make up for that percentage because they are all either a) not economically feasible or b) not technologically possible.

I'm reserving judgment on the issue because at my age and financial status there's not much I can do to prepare myself for it. I think it's more than paranoia, though (please consider their sources and also do a search for rebuttals), and we'll find out for certain in a few years.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
DamnthatDavid DamnthatDavid is offline
Puddle Pirate! ARRRR!
DamnthatDavid's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Oregon Dunes.
DamnthatDavid is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:30 PM       
You a bit off with the first one Perndog.

Hydrogen can directly replace Gasoline.

Hydrogen is an explosive (Note the Hindenburg)
But it is also a gas (vapor). A redesign, and complete sealing of a car and engine would be required.

It is more explosive, and packs more punch then Gasoline.
(which is why Car Companies are looking at Hydrogen Fuel Cells and not pure Hydrogen motors)

Any engine forced to put up with the rigors of a Hydrogen fuel source would shake itself apart if not close to perfectly made.

And my above statement is partially correct. You need alot more energy then from a simple battery. Hydroelectric Dams have everything set up to produce Hydrogen, just not compress and hold it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Royal Tenenbaum Royal Tenenbaum is offline
Senior Member
Royal Tenenbaum's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Winterpeg
Royal Tenenbaum is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:39 PM       
"A little about myself: A few months ago, I was a 25 year old law school graduate who found out he had just passed the California Bar Exam. I was excited about a potentially long and prosperous career in the legal profession, getting married, having kids, contributing to my community, and living the "American Dream." "

This is part where I'm like "faggggggggg." And then maybe I'll read the rest someday.


edit: Ok, I read it, and all I can say is FUCK. Seriously, this is insane, and I am so pissed.
__________________
"Well, I hear that Laurel Canyon is full of famous stars, But I hate them worse than lepers and I'll kill them in their cars."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:44 PM       
Sigh.

David. Listen to me.

Quote:
Take a car battery, attach wires to each end, run wires into fishtank. Keep them seperated. See the bubbles?
Right. How did you charge the battery in the first place? Batteries don't come out of the ground or the air.

I will repeat myself here. HYDROGEN IS NOT AN ENERGY SOURCE. IT REQUIRES MORE ENERGY TO EXTRACT HYDROGEN THAN IS PRODUCED BY BURNING IT.

Quote:
And my above statement is partially correct. You need alot more energy then from a simple battery. Hydroelectric Dams have everything set up to produce Hydrogen, just not compress and hold it.
Hydroelectric plants produce a very small percentage of the world's energy, dams are expensive to build, and there are only so many places you can build them.

Quote:
Hydrogen can directly replace Gasoline
We're not talking about running cars here, we're talking about everything that requires energy. Energy that is mostly produced by burning oil.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #9  
El Blanco El Blanco is offline
Mocker
El Blanco's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
El Blanco is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:48 PM       
Isn't nuclear power more efficient than oil?

And, if run properly, a nuclear power plant is a lot more enviormental friendly than oil. The problem is, it has the stigma. Everyone thinks "Chernobyl" or "Three Mile Island".
__________________
according to my mongoose, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 23rd, 2004, 11:53 PM       
Nuclear (fission) power is more efficient than oil, but there are three problems with it.

1) Uranium is in limited supply too.

2) Nuclear plants produce hazardous waste that is not as abundant as pollution from burning oil and safe if well-contained BUT very difficult to dispose of using current technology.

3) As you said, the stigma. Nuclear power has taken such hits in terms of public opinion and corporate support that here in Minnesota they actually built six coal power plants rather than one new nuclear plant. Yes, coal. Dirty, inefficient, etc.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #11  
executioneer executioneer is offline
OH GOD
executioneer's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
executioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contestexecutioneer won the popularity contest
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 12:00 AM       
well all we have to do is develop a working, efficient cold fusion reactor then

-willie
__________________
[COLOR=purple][COLOR=Magenta]SHAME ON A [COLOR=Pink]NIGGA WHO TRY TO RUN [/COLOR][URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVGI6mhfJyA"]GAME[/URL] ON A NIGGA[/COLOR]
[/COLOR]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 12:10 AM       
They've been working on that for a while.

But who knows when it will actually be possible. They've been sending letters to the US government for research grants but they're not getting any aid.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Pee Wee Herman Pee Wee Herman is offline
Senior Member
Pee Wee Herman's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pee Wee's Playhouse
Pee Wee Herman is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 12:44 AM       
We can use perpetual motion machines for generating energy.
__________________
I love you.

"Boy, me and my family sure are quoyed a lot in people's signatures"
-Max Burbank
Reply With Quote
  #14  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 10:57 AM       
regarding hydrogen.. tis true that hydrogen is a storage type fuel created from some other energy.

one of the best sources of hydrogen is solar power.. how many people think the sun won't rise tomorrow? barring the sun blowing up you can depend on making hydrogen many days of the year from water and solar power.. and solar panels last more than 30 years.

imho the hydrogen fuel cell (no combustion) is the way to go for home power generation. the combustion process has a tiny problem with ozone generation but if you live in mexico city or some city with lots of smog the hydrogen combustion process cleans many pollutants from the air making the exhaust cleaner than the intake air

all that aside peak oil problems are almost as bad as the global warming problems coming up.
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote
  #15  
DamnthatDavid DamnthatDavid is offline
Puddle Pirate! ARRRR!
DamnthatDavid's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Oregon Dunes.
DamnthatDavid is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 01:24 PM       
Quote:
Hydroelectric plants produce a very small percentage of the world's energy, dams are expensive to build, and there are only so many places you can build them.
I forget that most of the U.S. does not have hydroelectric dams. I guess only the Northwest shall benefit from Hydrogen cars.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
AChimp AChimp is offline
Resident Chimp
AChimp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: The Jungles of Borneo
AChimp is probably a real personAChimp is probably a real person
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 01:52 PM       
Canada has hydro dams up the wazoo. You'll take all your orders from us in the New Order.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Spectre X Spectre X is offline
Rating: Yes.
Spectre X's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dutchland
Spectre X is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 02:52 PM       
I fucking HOPE that this really happens. Gonna get myself into some Mad Max-like adventures.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chojin
everybody knows that pterodactyls hate the screech of a guitar :o
Reply With Quote
  #18  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 03:02 PM       
hehe, max makes an apearance in this peak oil vid

found at: http://www.piratevideo.tv/news/index.php
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Bennett Bennett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: one shot, right between the eyes, just for old times sake
Bennett is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 04:30 PM       
Peak makes antifreeze not oil you fags.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
The One and Only... The One and Only... is offline
Mocker
The One and Only...'s Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Harlem
The One and Only... is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 06:30 PM       
I'm waiting for the sunlight powered vehicles.

And on an unrelated note... wind power is not as damn impressive as you think it does. It takes up a large amount of space, and oil is still required as a backup energy source because of how fickle the weather can be.
__________________
I have seen all things that are done under the sun; all is vanity and a chase after wind.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 07:23 PM       
No one mentioned wind power, but you're right, and the same goes for solar power. Both are horribly unreliable.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #22  
DamnthatDavid DamnthatDavid is offline
Puddle Pirate! ARRRR!
DamnthatDavid's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Oregon Dunes.
DamnthatDavid is probably a spambot
Old Feb 24th, 2004, 11:53 PM       
Our best chances are thermal, hydroelectric dams (even if it kills the river) and tidal generators.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
derrida derrida is offline
Member
derrida's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
derrida is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2004, 01:06 AM       
Why not firewood and draft animals?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
ranxer ranxer is offline
Member
ranxer's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: U$
ranxer is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2004, 07:58 PM       
wind or solar shouldnt really stand alone.. together they can handle most reasonable household uses. i'll stick with the old lead acid batteries for storage though, hydrogen is a little tricky. this is my preparation for peak oil, um and getting a motorcycle.

oh and tagging suv's for fun with that sticker "I'm changing the Environment, ask me how" - kinda like therapy for the gas hog haters
__________________
the neo-capitalists believe in privatizing profits and socializing losses
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Perndog Perndog is offline
Fartin's biggest fan
Perndog's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Snowland
Perndog is probably a spambot
Old Feb 25th, 2004, 08:00 PM       
All vandals of any kind should be punched in the teeth repeatedly.

As soon as I own a house I will also equip it with solar panels; the problem is that they may run your house but they will be inadequate to sustain industry.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.