|
=======
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NA
|
|
Mar 12th, 2007, 02:25 PM
*sigh*
Max, I know you know this because we discussed it already. Richard Armitage was the one that "outed" Plame, if anybody, and Fitzpatrick KNEW that before the hearings began. This was simply a witch-hunt for process crimes from the beginning. Maybe they were looking for tips of your larger iceburgs, but if all they could come up with to that end was contradictory testimony that highlighted other contradictory testimony, why are you so proud to call this a victory? This is no where near on the same level as Sandy Berger, whom I know you disapproved of yet didn't use to paint the Clinton Royal Family red with the blood of innocent babies...
In answer to your question: I don't know. I think Bush "allowed" the investigations to prove they'd done nothing wrong, and the perjury charge was an unforeseen complication. I think they already know whether or not they can do it, and have already figured out what they're gonna do in any case. Probably has something to do with the appeals process and how that goes down.
|
__________________
mburbank~ Yes, okay, fine, I do know what you meant, but why is it not possible for you to get through a paragraph without making all the words cry?
How can someone who obviously thinks so much of their ideas have so little respect for expressing them? How can someone who so yearns to be taken seriously make so little effort?!
|
|
|