Quote:
So... 1.8 million made it through, and another 1.8 mil didn't?
Sounds like rigged elections.
|
This isn't elections, OAO, this is collecting votes on whether to have a referendum.
More than half of he collected signatures were
proven to be fraudulent. Thousands of pages of signatures were in the same handwriting, dead people somehow signed, babies signed, pro-Chavez people found their names signed. The opposition organisation which coordinated the collection of the signatures, SUMATE, admitted to using peoples bank card signatures. (SUMATE is on the payroll of the US National Endowment for Democracy, among others, btw.) Many workers in private industry faced threats of losing their jobs if they did not go to sign for the opposition. Many instances of signature sheets being taken into hospitals and psychiatric institutions where patients were being asked to sign in order to receive medical treatment were reported. There were also in which people had been bussed from one electoral district to another so that they could sign twice.
re article: 'The Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations' supported the coup attempt and the lockout, nothing much more really needs o b said. It is not like he was a supporter of Chavez before seeing the light and saying 'THIS HAS GONE TOO FAR!' He was always on the side of the capitalists.
Quote:
The opposition accuses National Guard troops of beating and detaining demonstrators who have violently protested the National Electoral Council's ruling Tuesday that the opposition had not collected enough signatures to trigger a recall referendum on Mr. Chávez's tumultuous rule. Seven people have been killed since Friday, the latest today in the western town of Machiques.
|
'The opposition accuses...', you might as well say 'The US government accuses...'. Since when has he oppositon demonstrated that it can be trusted?
' ...demonstrators who have violently protested the National Electoral Council's ruling...' doesn't mean that millions have protested with vigor, it means that hundres have used violence to protest - ie terorism. THE SEVEN PEOPLE KILLED WERE CHAVEZ SUPPORTERS! Families are being targeted by hit men!
The NEC was originaly neutral, then 3-2 in favour of Chavez but since things didn't go in the oppositions favour, they have been portrayed as Chavez's longtime lapdogs. This is the new staging ground for the weakenend opposition, they say things were unfair, when they were the ones using lies and trickery! They will use the fact that they were unable to gather the sinatures and turn it around so they are somehow the victim! Possibly their idea from the begining, since they would have known that the referendum was nwinable even if they could have brought it about. Chavez won elections by a landslide, 75% voted for his new constitution.
Quote:
The Organization of American States and Atlanta-based Carter Center, monitors of the signature collection, have criticized the council's decision
|
They are not "monitors"! Merely pro-opposition onlookers!
Imperialism and the local ruling elite cannot tolerate the situation as it stands any longer. They cannot tolerate a government that increases investment in health and education, refuses to privatise publicly-owned companies and utilities, opposes the Free Trade of the Americas Agreement, reasserts the nationalised character of the oil industry, etc. Above all they cannot tolerate the process of mass organisation and politicisation that has taken place in the country. On two occasions the revolutionary movement of the Venezuelan masses has defeated the plans of imperialism and the local oligarchy, when they organised their coup in April 11, 2002 and during the oil sabotage and bosses’ lock out of December 2002-January 2003.
The only way for to safeguard the revolutionary process is to strengthen it and to move forward. Those who organised the coup and the oil sabotage are still free or in exile. They must be brought to justice.
EDIT: Didn't get to finsh my post, here is the rest: (Also, please read this
)
Quote:
but the president's opponents promised a large march on Saturday.
|
By "large march" they mean a few hundred. On Sunday, February 29th, Caracas saw millions of ordinary working Venezuelans, the downtrodden, the poor, the workers and youth, march through the streets for six hours. Two days earlier the opposition had mobilised a much smaller force on the streets of Caracas. I am sure anyone could look on google to find pictures of the massie pro-chavez rallies, it wul be a little bit more difficult to find the pro-opposition ones.
A few interesting things were said by Chavez on the 29th, namely that if US imperialism dares to interfere in Venezuelan politics and tries to remove the democratically elected government of the country, not one drop of Venezuelan petroleum would go to the United States. 1.5 million barrels a day are sent to the US I think.
He also raised the possibility that the U.S. may be tempted to carry out a military intervention. Which I would not be surprised with. They may even be contemplating an attempted assassination of Chavez himself. If this were to happen, Venezuela would be thrown into even greater "turmoil". A civil war could be on the agenda. The masses would not remain passive. It would not be another Chile, the people are much more organised. They have a greater experience. They have gained much and will not be willing to give all this up to the reactionary, pro-imperialist gangsters that want to turn the clock back.
I would be on the lookout for a possible embargo to be imposed on Venezuela from outside, led by the United States and backed by their allies in the rest of Latin America in the near future.
Another rumour circulating in Venezuela is that the governor of Zulia, an oil-rich region on the border with Colombia, may be tempted to declare independence. This would be a provocation aimed at getting Chavez to intervene militarily and thus justify some external intervention to "save" Zulia.
A defeat for the Venezuelan workers would represent a defeat for all workers!