Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Nov 13th, 2003, 11:40 AM        Policy, collective punishment or free-floating retribution
From the Atlanta Journal Constitution


"The crackdown came a day after a Black Hawk helicopter crashed near Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, killing all six soldiers aboard. The cause of the crash remains uncertain although the U.S. command said in a statement that initial findings ``discount the use of surface-to-air missiles as a possible cause.''

Late Friday, U.S. troops fired mortars around the crash site and Air Force jets dropped at least three 500-pound bombs on the same area. U.S. commanders said they were trying to warn the locals against supporting insurgents."



So we don't know why our blackhawk crashed, but we're prettty sure it didn't get shot down. But we drop at least three 500 lbs bombs in the area as a 'warning'. Those are big ass bombs and they aren't cheap either. This is a strategy? Large scale bombing of an area where one of our copters went down for unknown reasons?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Buffalo Tom Buffalo Tom is offline
Member
Buffalo Tom's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Map Ref 41N 93W
Buffalo Tom is probably a spambot
Old Nov 13th, 2003, 11:54 AM        Re: Policy, collective punishment or free-floating retribut
Quote:
Originally Posted by mburbank
From the Atlanta Journal Constitution


"The crackdown came a day after a Black Hawk helicopter crashed near Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit, killing all six soldiers aboard. The cause of the crash remains uncertain although the U.S. command said in a statement that initial findings ``discount the use of surface-to-air missiles as a possible cause.''

Late Friday, U.S. troops fired mortars around the crash site and Air Force jets dropped at least three 500-pound bombs on the same area. U.S. commanders said they were trying to warn the locals against supporting insurgents."



So we don't know why our blackhawk crashed, but we're prettty sure it didn't get shot down. But we drop at least three 500 lbs bombs in the area as a 'warning'. Those are big funkagroovitalizer bombs and they aren't cheap either. This is a strategy? Large scale bombing of an area where one of our copters went down for unknown reasons?
This surprises you, given the commander-in-chief was bested by a piece of salted bread?
__________________
You're cooler than me
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Nov 13th, 2003, 01:41 PM       
The resistance against the US isn't a ground-swell of dissent against it's occupiers as much as a second breath from guerilla soldiers looking to subvert a traditional war. Tikrit is where a good amount of them are based, and unless I got the map turned around in my head, it's also the portal to and from Syria. It's also near where Saddam had his terrorist country club.

Which doesn't really explain what they were targetting, if anything, but it's not as random as you're making it out to be.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Buffalo Tom Buffalo Tom is offline
Member
Buffalo Tom's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Map Ref 41N 93W
Buffalo Tom is probably a spambot
Old Nov 13th, 2003, 02:17 PM       
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abcdxxxx
The resistance against the US isn't a ground-swell of dissent against it's occupiers as much as a second breath from guerilla soldiers looking to subvert a traditional war.
That's presumptuous of you to make that claim. No one knows the real story behind these attacks, including the Administration. If the Administration knew the real reasons behind the attacks, then Iraq would be a more secure place than it is now.
__________________
You're cooler than me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Nov 13th, 2003, 02:23 PM       
"this is an insurgency, and that it is gaining strength because Iraqis have no confidence that there is anyone on the horizon who is going to stick around in Iraq as a real alternative to the former regime."
-CIA report released earlier today.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Abcdxxxx Abcdxxxx is offline
Mocker
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Abcdxxxx is probably a spambot
Old Nov 14th, 2003, 12:58 AM       
There's no presumption involved in recognizing these attacks are planned, and strategic .... or to recognize the thousands that crossed the Syrian, and Iranian borders with the intent to fight an International presence there, or that fighters of questionable origins have been caught in Iraq.... or that the aid workers there to assist the suffering and other non-combatants were targeted ... or that we should know the reasons behind the attacks, because you would have to be an ignorant fool not to listen to the very vocal criticism of the US coming from all parts of the Arab world... make that the entire world... knowing the reasons doesn't make securing the country any easier. Do we know why the US is in danger for attacks on our own soil? Are we any more secure for it ? Somehow, not really.

Sure a lot of Saddam loyalist went underground, but keep in mind that the typical fed up Iraqi isn't trained in night time guerilla warfare.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.