Aug 27th, 2004, 06:50 AM
The problem as I see it is that marriage has something to do with the state. You get tax-benefits living together, you have a legal status, the rights of your children, heritage, a whole sleeve of things are tied in with marriage, making marriage a legal thing.
If it weren't for all of this, marriage would be a sheer personal thing, born out of love, and the government wouldn't be able to stop homosexuals getting married.
Why can uncle sam, or father france, or whomever, stop homosexuals from getting married? In a stupidity/unfairness scale, I think it ranks about the same as stopping homosexuals from having sex. (It has been done, by the way. The inventor of the pc, Charles Babbage, was a homosexual, and the british government injected him with oestrogenes in order to turn him straight again)
It all comes down to freedom. I know it's a cliché word, but bear with me. If marriage is seen as a commitment in front of the lord, or the ones you love, then who the hell else than the two people involved can stop them/force them, whatever? It's nobodies business!
But yeah, because marriage has been around so long, it's become the norm. And our entire society has been built around it.
What is the worst that can happen if you allow homosexuals to get married? In my country, it's been legal for a year now, and surprise, surprise... shit all has changed. And why the hell would it?
I think this is a basic case of a people who are afraid of something projecting their fears onto other people. Priest who was afraid of sex in medieval times, telling people having sex will land you in hell. Same as this. People who are afraid of homosexuals - who don't get it - and who project that fear onto society, using other people/the moral fibre, whatever... as an excuse to give existance to their fear of the unknown.
I'm firmly on the side of homosexual marriage. And before any of you jokers begin, not the rear side, no...
|