Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
The_voice_of_reason The_voice_of_reason is offline
Senior Member
The_voice_of_reason's Avatar
Join Date: May 2003
Location: yes
The_voice_of_reason is probably a spambot
Old May 26th, 2003, 07:53 PM        Look I don't dissagree with everything Pres. Bush does
http://www.discover.com/current_issue/index.html

Bush Gambles on Fusion Energy
by Kathy A. Svitil




Construction of ITER, a fusion test reactor, is slated to begin in 2006.
Graphic courtesy of Iter.

The United States has rejoined the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project, placing a high-stakes wager that nuclear fusion—a reaction that runs purely on hydrogen—can steer the country away from fossil fuels and toward energy independence. At a projected cost of $5 billion, ITER will be the second-biggest international scientific investment in history, behind the International Space Station. Richard Hazeltine, a theoretical physicist at the University of Texas at Austin, argues that the investment is irresistible. "We have a clear target: an environmentally benign way to make large amounts of electric power," he says.

The project almost didn't happen. The United States dropped out in 1998, citing the reactor's excessive cost and complexity. ITER planners finally won back the United States, along with China and Canada, by developing a scaled-back design that halves the price. The underlying technology remains much the same, however. A doughnut-shaped magnetic bottle will confine hydrogen nuclei as they are heated to at least 180 million degrees Fahrenheit. At that temperature, the hydrogen nuclei will combine to produce helium, neutrons, and enough energy to generate electricity and sustain further reactions—a so-called burning plasma. "Creating and controlling a burning plasma is a litmus test for fusion, analogous to the Wright brothers' first flight," says physicist Dale Meade of Princeton University's Plasma Physics Laboratory. These reactions, similar to the ones that power the sun, produce no greenhouse gases and minimal radioactivity.

Like the administration's fuel-cell-car initiative, ITER is about long-term solutions to the country's energy problems. The reactor will not be completed until 2014, and physicists estimate that developing a demonstration commercial-scale fusion power plant could take 35 years or so. "We may fail, but if we succeed, we'll change the world in a wonderful way," Hazeltine says.
__________________
I like to masturbate
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Wang Wang is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: bunghole
Wang is probably a spambot
Old May 27th, 2003, 02:07 AM        confusion
and the point of that was?..........
__________________
wait till i get my hands on you you fucking asshole!-danny devito The Way Things Are.

check out my fav website: megatokyo.com!(so what if i cant make a link? shutup!)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
farbour farbour is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: racine,wisconsin
farbour is probably a spambot
Old May 28th, 2003, 06:22 AM       
The hydrogen power thing seems more like a public relations move than an actually sincere goal. The election is only about a year away and Bush is still taking shit from environmentalists. He's just covering his bases now.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.