Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KevinTheHerbivore
Why? Not that I disagree necessarily, I'm just interested in an expansion of this argument......
|
Because several smaller parties hold opinions closer to various individuals than the two dominant ones.
Take, for example, the Republican Party. How many ideologically moderate libertarians and conservatives voted for Bush despite better suited alternatives (i.e. Reform Party, Libertarian Party)?
Now, the reason I mention the Democratic Party is due to the fact that it does not have a very well established base as far as political theory. The Republican Party does: it has favored neoconservativism in recent years. The DP has a greater variety - environmentalists and supporters of big labor are both left-wing, but sometimes come into conflict.
I think that a few dominant, broad parties would arise out of the chaos that followed so as to ensure enough support to be strong. On the other hand, I think that a few of them would be very different from the ones that we have now.
Threaded Mode
