9-11

[El Blanco]

Originally Posted by Command Prompt

After listening to coast to coast last night, I had to wonder, why exactly does everyone put up with the completley inadequate explanation of what happened that day?

Because there is a mountain of evidence to back it up?

1. Most engineers agree that it was nearly impossible for the buildings to collapse the way they did.

Thats more of a statement than a question. And an incorrect statement at that. The engineering department at my college all think its possible for that to happen. The engineering department at MIT agree that it could happen that way.

The main thing they disagree on is exactly how it happened. Whether the frame warped because of the heat or how the sequence of events played out.

I have yet to see one credable physivs or engineering professional completly disavow the official story.

2.

even though terrorism and iraq arn't directly related.

al Queda and Iraq weren't directly related. Its no secret Hussien offered hundreds of thousands of dollars to the families of suicide bombers in Israel. Its no secret he had training camps and gave logistical support to terrorist factions. He just doesn't seemed to be linked to this one particual attack.

Bin Laden was trained by the CIA

No, he wasn't. He was involved with the mujhadeen, which was trained by the CIA, but he generally used his own family resources and stepped in to take over our communications and logistical network in AFGHANISTAN AFTER THE SOVIETS PULLED OUT.

to kill Iranians

No, we used Hussien to kill Iranians, bin Laden(indirectly) to kill Soviets.

but that is niether here nor there since the current war is unrelated.

If we had bin LAden in Irq to kill Iranians, how can you say he had nothing to do with Hussien?

I'm so fucking confused at this point,

Boy, is that an understatement.

can anyone make sense of this mess?

I'd try, but you'd have to show me where you are getting your "facts" first so I know how big I mountain I gotta climb.