|
Mocker
|
 |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New York
|
|

Mar 24th, 2006, 02:59 PM
Wasn't Bill Clinton the one that made 'regime change' the policy towards Iraq? He just never got around to act on it or didn't see it in his political favor. I really doubt its because he is a less evil man than Bush. I bet if Clinton was president after 911 we would of invaded Iraq since the time for multiple missed oppturtunities to kill our enemies (clinton passed on 2 or 3 chances to capture or kill bin laden; don't want to upset the Arab emotions) was a thing of the past. Invading Iraq was def the wrong move but I think the mistake would of been made with clinton in power. I don't think it is a result of the evil nature of Bush and company.
Bush is not a very good president and an even worse speaker. But evil?
|
__________________
I'm all for the idea of stoning the rapists, but to death...? That's a bit of a stretch, but I think the system will work. - Geggy
|
|
|