Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spectre X
Yes, it was designed to withstand aeroplanes crashing into them.
BUT, they weren't designed to withstand big giant fucking Boeing 767s crashing into them near top speed. If you look at the videos, you can see that the planes nearly go right through the fucking towers. It's not hard to imagine that something with that much force would severely weaken the building's core.
|
plausible, yes, but,
1. neither plane hit the center of the towers yet both towers fell almost straight down. i would have a lot of doubt about the demolition theories if they tipped over.
2. Then there's the rate of fall being nearly at the speed of freefall, just doesnt make sense unless there was timed demolition.
3. explosion of debris as geggy pointed out.
4. molten metal in the rubble that burned for weeks and couldn't be put out, that lends to the demolition theory and this might be one of the most critical pieces of evidence.
5. i don't know enough about the pulverization of the concrete but its existance is problematic to the bush admins theory and needs to be explained better.
none of these oddities were addressed by the commission report.
Threaded Mode
