Go Back   I-Mockery Forum > I-Mockery Discussion Forums > Philosophy, Politics, and News
FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
AlliSabbah AlliSabbah is offline
Member
AlliSabbah's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
AlliSabbah is probably a spambot
Old Dec 13th, 2007, 09:51 AM       
The John quote is not good for your case as he is saying he is not afraid to die due to knowledge of his ascension to heaven. It clearly states that without life after death his followers would be willing to fight to protect him.

10:3 Though we live in the flesh we do not wage war after the flesh.

Saying thier war is for souls not bodies.

Your Corinthians 10:4 quote is butchered like your earlier quote. Im going to suggest you get a King James bible instead of whatever hacked up version you happen to be looking at now.

(For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds.)

It is a message to the Christians of Corinth trying to bolster thier faith in times of trouble. Though they may not be strong physically thier faith can move mountains basically.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Dec 13th, 2007, 11:31 AM       
"it is debated on the number,"


AAAAAAAGH!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
mburbank mburbank is offline
The Moxie Nerve Food Tonic
mburbank's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: right behind you
mburbank has disabled reputation
Old Dec 13th, 2007, 11:50 AM       
" we do not fight with weapons at all"

Well, so much for soldiering being the noblest profession. I agree with you, Jesus was a radical peacenik and expected as much of his followers. Why tout the superiority of a religion you not only don't follow, but who's values you flaunt? What does it matter what club you claim to belong to. Call yourself a Zoroastrian for all I care.

Who knows what the Jeeze would have done were he sexual at all? Concidering he mostly hung with dudes, have you considered the possability he was a fag? I know the bible doesn't mention him doing guys, but it doesn't mention him pooping either, and I bet he did. Are you championing his lack of sexuality? You who list intercourse as one of the few worthwhile things in life?

I think the Superman comics are superior to Christianity, cause not only is the last son of Krypton as moral as Jesus, he can FLY an he has HEAT VISION! Or if you don't believe in Jesus, I think Ghandi was superior, because we know for a fact what he did, and in the case of Mohamed and Jesus we only have ancient texts.

IN ADDITION, polygammy and marriage to pre pubescent women was not at all unusual. Often females were betrothed when they were still infants, and that doesn't mean the biblical world was rife with baby sex. There wasn't much point in sex prior to the ability to have children, especially when you already had other wives who could. You speculate Mohamed was a pediophile because you are a repulsive person with a need to feel your 'clubs' are better than other peoples. You want to feel your religion is better and makes you better? Try practicing it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
sspadowsky sspadowsky is offline
Will chop you good.
sspadowsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Thrill World
sspadowsky is probably a spambot
Old Dec 20th, 2007, 09:29 PM       
My bullshit religion is better than your bullshit religion.
__________________
"If honesty is the best policy, then, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy. Second is not all that bad."
-George Carlin
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

   


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 AM.


© 2008 I-Mockery.com
Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.