Vince, you're right. I'm sure it was the ONLY example of poor discretion on the part of Foxnews.com. Somehow, despite the odds being fairly slim, I managed to come across it....
You don't need "mainstream" judgement for a piece of shit that doesn't even classify as journalism, especially since the source itself hardly classified as "mainstream."
I could go find the article, dismantle it piece by piece, and make you (once again) look silly. I however can't afford to do this, 1. due to Finals, and 2. due to the fact that logic falls on a deaf ear with you anyway.
EDIT: Here's a link to the article, which has
not been retracted:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,80925,00.html
Threaded Mode
