Quote:
|
So then you assert that the breakdown of the marriage/traditional family is a problem, yet you believe there is no problem with breaking down the marriage/traditional marriage because times have changed? Shouldn't we look more at the problems first? Or more importantly, resolve these problems?
|
Where did I assert that? When I mentioned that "marriage is not what it used to be?" It isn't. And that is just a prevelant in religious couples as it is in non-religious couples. The reasons behind it may be different in some cases. But just because a couple is married before God does not make them a better couple or a better family.
Since my nana raised me and my sisters and that isn't a traditional family, should we give up the word family? How about single parents?
Quote:
|
And are you saying that anyone who is religious is a nut? If some alien religon makes up a word that is important to them, and attaches a ceremony to it, isn't it their right to be annoyed when they land on Earth and humans want to change the ceremony? How about the very definition of the word?
|
No, I said religious nuts. That is quite different.
So which religious ceremony should be considered a marriage? Jewish, Catholic, Protestant, Wiccan, Voodoo, Muslim, Morman, Hindu, Christian, Satanist......I think you get the point.
And how has it been changed? And to what? A Catholic ceremony is still a Catholic ceremony. A Jewish one is still a Jewish one. They don't take anything away from each other. And neither does a civil ceremony.
And what definition of the word? The dictionary? The legal? Mine? Yours? The scientific? A religious one? Which religious one?
Threaded Mode
