I don't like that idea, personally, i dont like the whole, "Time was created I mean Unfolded thing". Too contradictory and open ended, still leaves the question of where it came from. Plus it's a universal CONSTANT so it's like.. you know. Plus time is a human concept. There is no time in space, only movement. What is to say there wasn't movement and such inside of the little bulb, and besides that; as the universal constant goes, there was an "Epic Battle" of sorts between the Push and Pull, which marks some form of growth and change, which marks "Time", movement and action. Therefore time couldn't have expanded because of it.
Basically, to underline my basic "Rebuttal". Before you were born, there was time. Just because you were not aware of it because you were still a little seed and egg-- before you began to expand as a fetus-- but there was still time. There was, and is, "Time" "movement" and "changes". The universe didn't start when you were born, only your perception of the universe did.
The only rebuttal to this is that the universe wasnt "one of many fetus' " but the only fetus around. He was too cool for school, so time could've flowed with it. Being the one of one, however, is quite a sad fallacy.
Think about mirrors.
Threaded Mode
