Hey guys I made gotard of the day. This guy totally made a fool of me in some chat room and POSTED IT ONLINE ON HIS GOTARD.COM WEBSITE TO HUMILIATE ME.
I thought that you guys would appreciate me being made a philosophical fool! THIS MAN IS A GENIUS, AND IF YOU DONT BELIEVE ME, YOU CAN VIEW HIS 700 WEBSITES ABOUT HIMSELF AND HIS CHRONICLES OF STUPID PEOPLE.
I'm only Gotard for a single day... so as they say, carpe diem.
http://gotards.com/Intangible_chaos
IM ON A WEBSITE.
here's a condensed version, I'll skip the leadup:
13.43.59 gremlin_net: [11] Apparently, intangible_chaos regards goblins to be as likely as deities.
13.43.59 intangible_chaos: Premise 1: Everything that begins to exist has a cause. Premise 2: The universe began to exist. Conclusion 1: Therefore, the universe must have a cause.
13.44.06 intangible_chaos: How so, gremlin?
13.44.15 gremlin_net: [12] intangible_chaos: You never answered the question.
13.44.15 intangible_chaos: WHAT ABOUT THE TOOTHFAIRY can you see me rolling my eyes
13.44.24 gremlin_net: [13] intangible_chaos: What logical evidence points to deities while excluding goblins in the same role? <— repost
13.44.29 intangible_chaos: there are differences between a god and goblins, don't try to draw false analogies.
13.44.55 gremlin_net: [14] intangible_chaos: What are the differences? That's pretty much what I was asking.
13.45.08 intangible_chaos: What are the differences between God and HUman beings?
13.45.23 gremlin_net: [15] intangible_chaos: I'll wait here for you to think up an answer....
13.45.40 intangible_chaos: You're the one who has to show me how they are at all similar
13.46.04 gremlin_net: [16] intangible_chaos: They're both unproved, unevidenced myths believed in my a minority.
(deities are believed in only my a minority
AN EXTREMELY SMALL MINORITY LIKE .0000001 percent of people believe in gods thats it. Statistics from gremlin.net)
13.46.33 gremlin_net: [17] intangible_chaos: Horses have an atomic weight of twelve, and proved under controlled conditions.
13.46.36 gremlin_net: [18] as*
13.47.14 intangible_chaos: okay, well t he most obvious difference between goblins and god i sthat GOD may have been a necessary component in order for the universe to have existed
13.47.19 gremlin_net: [19] intangible_chaos: Have deities got an atomic weight of twelve? Yes or No will do.
13.47.23 intangible_chaos: whereas goblins are unnecessary and their existence serves no purpose
13.47.38 intangible_chaos: I don't know if they have an atomic weight
13.48.09 intangible_chaos: Do goblins or the fey world serve a NECESSARY purpose in order for the world to have possibly even begun?
13.48.10 intangible_chaos: no
13.48.17 gremlin_net: [20] intangible_chaos: So the exclusion of universebuilding goblins relies on your personal, subjective definition of goblins, while deities build universes by your other personal, subjective definition. How logical.
(THIS IS WHERE THE GENIUS BEGINS TO SHINE. CHECK THAT SHIT OUT. DEITIES AND GOBLINS ARE SO SUBJECTIVE YOU CAN CALL THEM WHATEVER YOU WANT AND GIVE THEM WHATEVER QUALITIES YOU WANT)
13.48.36 intangible_chaos: Well, if goblins built the universe, then they could be analogous with god
13.48.42 intangible_chaos: and would have to have the same form as god
13.48.55 intangible_chaos: So you might as well call them God instead of Goblins
13.49.23 intangible_chaos: and your analogy of approaching me with something of goblins, something which isn't god, and then changing the definition of them to something similar as god, is ridiculous
13.49.29 gremlin_net: [21] intangible_chaos: But they'd be called goblins. And you'd be boasting that you have logical evidence of goblins. That you summarily reject goblins as universebuilders without reason tells me about your logic.
13.49.47 intangible_chaos: because we weren't considering goblins as universe builders
13.50.00 gremlin_net: [22] intangible_chaos: And, that you led with that stupid a priori logical evidence tells me that you've got nothing better ready to go. Ge back to me when you think of something less flimsy.
13.50.14 intangible_chaos: YOU SAID THAT HORSES HAD AN ATOMIC WEIGHT BUT MAYBE I DIDNT MEAN THOSE HORSES MAYBE I MEANT THE IMAGINARY HORSES
13.50.18 intangible_chaos: that tells me something about your logic
13.50.32 gremlin_net: [23] intangible_chaos: So you're moving your goalposts? Whee. Tell someone stupid.
(Oh, he's NOT stupid. I FORGOT SOMEHOW)
13.50.44 intangible_chaos: you moved your goal posts
13.50.51 intangible_chaos: you talked about goblins, something which have a definition other than god
13.50.56 intangible_chaos: and then changed the definition to god
13.50.58 intangible_chaos: thats ridiculous
13.51.17 gremlin_net: [24] intangible_chaos: No I didn't. Goblins remain goblins: mythical, unevidenced creatues.
13.51.37 intangible_chaos: so what? A unicorn is an unevidenced creature but i wouldn't say that it is identical to a piece of shit
13.51.51 intangible_chaos: because there is a popular conception of what a unicorn is, a definition
13.52.00 gremlin_net: [26] intangible_chaos: You're unaware of the evidence for shit? You're an idiot; we're done here.
(
I d idn't even know what shit was)
13.52.09 intangible_chaos: if you are going to break the bounds of definitions whenever it is convenient for you then there can be no logical argument
13.52.14 intangible_chaos: Okay, how about GOBLIN SHIT
13.52.38 intangible_chaos: anyway, thats kinda my point. I could just change the definition of God to human beings and then look GOD EXISTS and it was just your subjective definition of GOD which meant that he didn't exist.
13.52.42 gremlin_net: [27] Anyone else got evidence of deities? Someone selfaware, perhaps? No? Right. What else is new....
13.53.07 intangible_chaos: your logic fails, gremlin
13.53.14 intangible_chaos: especially your gigantic fallacies...
13.53.18 gremlin_net: [28] Nevermind. This is stupid enough that I'm keeping it. Be back in a bit....
Guys I'm so ashamed how am I gonna live with myself
Threaded Mode
