Quote:
Originally Posted by MrAdventure
I'm not sure what kind of Photoshop Day Care you came from, but most critics don't walk into a gallery treating it like a swap meet. There isn't some sort of requirement to critique, as much as you may feel it enhances the experience, that concept is wholly uncalled for in this situation.
You felt like showing your works.
They stunk.
Hilarious, reeks of effort but it's very flawed.
Get it?
Oh and the request to cease posting was directed more at xandor than yourself, but I'm not opposed to you taking that bit for yourself.
I HATE HAVING TO DO THIS TO GET IT ACROSS 
|
There is a saying, "Consider the source". You are right. As you have shown by your own example, any idiot off the street can offer an opinion, no matter how stupid, ill-informed, or blatently incorrect. Congratulations on being one of those idiots. What I am trying to do is find out which of you vocal critics, if any, have any ground to stand on when you slam my work. I'm trying to consider the source, and if the source is saying he can photoshop better than I can, I would like to see proof. If the critic is unable or unwilling to do so, the source is full of shit and the critical comments mean less than shit.
You see, most critics who walk into a gallery have some form of art background, or at the very least they can appear to. If you don't like the work that I have done, fine. My world doesn't pivot on your approval. And as of yet I have not seen anything by you, Jamesman, Chojin, or any of the rest of you insulting dinks that I can look at and say, "Wow! That's a great job of photoshopping!" And I have a feeling from what I *have* seen that you have posted, I never will.