| 
                 
                Let me begin with a little background about myself. I am a music addict.
                I love music, I'll listen to just about anything from classic rock to
                classical, anything from the Velvet Underground to Pavement to Hank Williams
                Sr. to Robert Johnson. As a music lover, I find it not only enjoyable, but
                practically imperative that I buy albums. I'm the kind of person that will
                buy an album just to have it because I love the artist that put it out. I've been known to buy albums that suck, just so that I can have one song by a
                group that I enjoy. Furthermore, regardless of Napster, I will continue to
                do this in the future.  
                     With that said, I only recently discovered Napster. I had heard about
                it from friends, but I wasn't able to access the Internet for a while, so it
                was only about four weeks ago that I first logged on. At first, I had some
                reservations about using the service because I was having my inner debate
                about whether or not it was theft, and whether or not it was fair to the
                artists, et cetera, et cetera. I decided to get online and check it out for
                myself to find out what all the commotion was about, and I was determined to
                make up my own mind about the service and not let the record company
                executives, or my friends, make up my mind for me. I tried to be as unbiased
                and open minded as possible in my exploration, and what follows is a brief
                synopsis of what I found, and my feelings on the subject.  
                     I went online, and I did use the service to download about thirty
                songs. However, all of these songs were by one group that happens to be one
                of my particular favorites, and all of the songs that I downloaded were  
                songs that are not commercially available, either because they have long
                been out of print, or they are only available on live bootleg recordings
                that are impossible to find. If these songs were available for purchase, I
                would gladly fork over the money because that's the kind of freak that I am.
                I am so obsessive about music that I just like to have the album case to stare at, like a deer in the headlights or a cheerleader in chemistry class,
                I am content to just sit with a mindless expression on my face and smile as
                if I had just lobotomized myself, perhaps some of you can identify with my
                plight.  
                     I was very surprised by the availability of tracks that I had long
                heard rumors of, but which had always been as illusive as a big foot in the
                woods to me. In a relatively short time, I had completed, to the best of my
                knowledge, my collection, and I felt very satisfied. Since then, I haven't
                been on Napster, but I've thought about it a lot, especially in light of the
                recent controversy surrounding the service.  I originally was of the opinion
                that the service should be closed because it was theft and it wasn't fair to
                the artists, but I've had a change of heart.  
                     My experience is that most people who use Napster only download one or
                two songs by an artist and discard the rest. They tend to have a random
                assortment of songs on their computers by artists that, in my opinion, have no business making as much money as they do to produce the crap that they
                put out. Hence, I really don't care what Napster does to the music industry,
                in fact I'm glad that Napster scares the music industry. Here's why. 
                Most of the music, if you can call it that, that you hear on the radio or
                television is boring and unimaginative. I'm sick of listening to boring,  
                whiny punk bands rehash some movement that died out about two decades ago.
                Yes, you are about as annoying as disco cover bands, and no, you would not
                hurt my feelings if you were to disappear from the earth. I'm also sick of
                all this crappy metal/rap/violent I'm angry because I'm so bored and so
                privileged that I have nothing better to do music. Likewise, I can't seem to find the determination within myself to take my brain out of my head and
                flush it down the toilet, which is precisely what is necessary if I want to
                attempt to like little boy and girl bands, and I don't.  
                 Furthermore, if I
                have to listen to many more songs about how much money you have now and how
                many women you sleep with and how much of a bad ass in general you are set
                to a backdrop of generic synthesized bass beats and hip hop banality, I'm
                going to fall asleep at the wheel of my truck from boredom and crash, but
                believe me I will attempt to find a way to drive it straight into a radio
                tower so that hopefully my death could set some people somewhere free from
                the absolute boredom emitted daily on the air waves.     Music is so boring today! I mean, can't artists come up with something
                new to say, can't we use our imaginations to interest people instead of bore
                them to death with the same old crap we've heard time and again since the
                dawn of time. Isn't it time to direct our energy into something productive
                rather than mouth off about how everything sucks, but offer no solutions to
                fix it. Aren't we a little sick of being angry for the sake of being angry.     I believe that music is about revolution; it is about change. All music
                forms strive to always say something new in a way that no one has ever said
                it, but today's music doesn't do that. Have we become lazy, have we come to
                expect less, demand less?  
                 I personally think that it is due to several
                factors. The first being that the average American is stupid. I'm not saying
                that I'm much different. Unfortunately we live in a society where it is easy
                to sit around and be spoon-fed everything we know about our world from the  
                television. Why would you expect more from the industry that sells you an
                image and not music, and that's truly what the problem is. We've lost our
                focus, it isn't about what an artist says anymore, but what he wears when he
                says it, or how many times we can see him say it on TV, or who he has to
                help him say it, not that there's really any substance to any of what's
                being said anyway. You know, music has always been about an attitude, but
                generally you had to have something to say in order for people to listen.  
                Now though, TV has made us believe that we have to be obsessed with the
                image alone and as a result of our buying into this obsession, we've lost
                our interest in what is being said. "As long as I have the same clothes and
                attitude as the guy on the screen, I'll be all right because I'll be cool
                like everyone else." This is particularly funny since most of these groups
                preach independence and non conformity, as long as it's their thing I guess.     Where has the quality gone? To be fair, there are some groups left that
                put out genuinely good material, but they are few and far  between. It is a
                rare experience to go into a record store today and come home with a truly
                quality recording that you can listen to all the way through and not fall
                asleep or throw up. Most of the time the only good song, and I use the word good in the loosest possible sense, is the song you hear on the TV, that is
                if you're actually one of the rare few that is privileged enough to actually
                hear music on TV anymore.         You have to be a narcoleptic or a
                masochist to actually be conscious during the times that you can catch music
                anymore, the rest of the scarce time that music is played you have to either
                have a strong self hatred in order to want to subject yourself to it or you have to stick your head in the microwave, turn the power on and cook your
                brain, bringing you to the necessary level to appreciate it.  
                     Hooray for Napster! Hooray for the slap in the face that says that we
                intelligent consumers will be fooled no longer by your mediocre crap! I'm
                glad that people don't have to pay for a rip-off; no longer do they feel
                obligated to line someone's pockets by shelling out twenty bucks for a
                seventeen cent piece of plastic with approximately 3.5 minutes of
                semi-quality material on it and a bunch of filler that I'm convinced has
                subliminal messages to make you stupid and overly self conscious about
                nothing. It is truly incredible that the very capitalistic system that has
                spawned such a horrible monster has potentially spawned its demise. HaHaHa!  
                Death to crap rock! I guess it was only inevitable that if you make people
                such obsessive image conscious consumers, they would eventually seek the
                path of least resistance which allows them to fill this shallow need with
                the least amount of outside influence. We've taken the crap on the plate
                before us, filtered out the peanuts, liquefied the shit and intravenously
                mainlined it to our brains.     And now the music industry cowers shaking in a corner, like so many
                bullies who've finally had their bluff called by someone with the gumption and the know-how to knock them on their asses, and we ask what next? 
                Well, I, for one, am very excited, because I believe that the door has
                been kicked off its hinges for the overwhelming return of music to the music
                industry. Maybe now artists will realize they can't fool us with flashy
                images anymore, because we've found a way to circumvent them in order to
                fulfill our need. Maybe there will actually be a resurrection of quality,
                and bands will actually try to produce material that is good through and
                through, rather than rest on the haunches of the one hit single that isn't
                going to make them millions by itself anymore. Maybe if the music industry as we know it dies, all of those people will just dry up and blow away.  
                     Music will stay though. Music has been around almost as long as man has
                walked the earth, and despite what they may try to sell you on TV, whether
                or not it comes in a flashy package, people will always have the urge to
                pick up an instrument and belt out a song, not because there's money to be
                made, but because they feel that it has to be said.     "Well what about us?", the poor artists may say. "What's owed to us? We
                paid our dues, we need to make a living too." Well first of all, I don't
                feel that I owe you anything. Music is something that no one can own because
                everyone has the potential within them to create it. Yes some are better
                than others, but that is a question of talent, not ownership and it is very pompous of anyone to assume that I should owe them anything because they are
                better at it than me. I owe you nothing, yes you've provided me with
                memories and entertainment, and for that I am thankful, but without you, I'm
                sure I would survive somehow, so I don't owe you anything.  
                 And what about
                this price we put on talent, can we put a price on talent? Yes, I can, in
                fact we all can, you see, your function as an entertainer is essentially
                that of a public servant, you give us a service we desire and in return you
                are paid. However, as such, you are subject to the fickle interests and
                whims of the population you serve, and as consumers, we determine how much
                your service is worth to us. Don't make the mistake that many athletes and
                entertainers often fall prey to, and assume that because you have talent
                alone you are worth something. You are in business because people like us
                are willing to pay for you to be in business. The only person to whom talent
                is priceless is the person who possesses it.  
                     As for the "well I've paid my dues routine," spare me. You get paid to
                play an instrument. I play an instrument for fun because I find it relaxing,
                if someone would pay me ten dollars a week to do that I'd be happy. And as far as paying your dues, so you might have been hungry, you might have slept
                on the floor, welcome to the life of the average college student. You want
                to talk about paying your dues, you aren't scrubbing toilets or digging
                ditches or risking your life, but there are plenty of people out there who
                are, and they're shelling out their hard earned money to pay you so that you can sleep in a mansion and eat good food and have sex with anyone you want
                to. Ask any rock star if he'd want to trade places with those people and see
                what he says. You may have paid your dues and reached the promised land, but
                there are plenty of people out there paying their dues right now and they're
                never going to pay them off. They'll die paying their dues and paying your salary, so spare me the self righteousness.  
                     Maybe musicians will have to work for a change, maybe in order to enjoy
                the same lifestyle, they'll have to tour religiously. Don't feel bad for
                them though, I'm sure that the money they pull in on the average tour is a bit more than the average American makes for doing some real work.     But let's not think negatively. Things have changed, that's a fact.
                Even if we shut down Napster, people have still seen the light and there
                will be more Napsters to come. Instead of wallowing in that, how about we
                look past it and say what now. How about we think of it in a different way.     Why do we have to sell records? With the technology available today all  
                you need to record an album is a computer. My friends and I have figured out
                how to do that, and we are by no means studio pros. I would think someone
                who has that kind of experience would have no problem assembling their
                product at home. Why do this? No production costs, just the up front expense
                of the equipment, and then you can make as many albums as you want with no
                studio, production or distribution costs. You could embrace the Internet
                instead of decrying it and release your album straight into the cyber world
                free of charge to the fans. What does this get you? Well the loyalty of your fans first and foremost. Second, it would give you the freedom to truly say
                whatever you wanted, however you wanted to say it, without some business
                minded executive telling you what will and won't be profitable. Then you can
                tour your ass off and still make a lot more money than most people do. Cut
                down on the expenses too, no fancy lights or pyrotechnics. Do we really need that to appreciate the music, or is that something you need to distract us
                from the music, or lack there of? Just you, an instrument, a stage,
                thousands of screaming fans and the music.  
                 Can't work? Why not, the Beatles
                and Elvis did it and they're still some of the most popular artists ever. But it doesn't end there. You can still merchandise your music with shirts and posters. Then you make the radio and TV stations pay you to play
                the music. This puts the pressure on the artist to produce good music
                because you want to have a hit, because you get paid every time it gets
                played. There's no room for flashy expense anymore, so boring music that
                relies on its image goes away, and as a result there is a booming resurgence
                in the music industry that once again plays, good music. With the demand to
                see and hear this music growing, TV and radio will be happy to pay the
                asking price because they need to in order to stay in business. You see if
                they don't pay you, you sue them on the grounds that since you offer your
                music free to the public, they must either do the same by not charging for
                advertising and services, which allow them to make money off of your
                efforts, or they must  give you a cut of the profit which comes in this
                small, flat, reasonable fee. You get away with this because you are not
                charging for the music, but rather the privilege of other people charging
                for your music. 
                 Finally there will always be freaks like me who want to own the album, just because they are sick that way, so
                you make the record companies bid on the rights to print your material. They pay for all associated costs, and you know why they'll do it? Because you no longer need them, they need you,
                and they know that they've got a sure thing to make money on or they can go
                out of business.  
                     Sure, you may not make as much money as you used to. But would that
                truly be a bad thing? Is money really all there is to life? You'll still be
                making a lot more than me and a lot of people like me, and you'll be
                producing quality material. When people remember you ten years from now it
                won't be as a joke, a "God, what were we thinking", but as something that
                truly made a difference. To top it off, you'll still have more loyal fans
                than I'll ever have. The revolution is coming, are you going to be driving
                the train, or trying to catch it as you're left behind.     Ahhh, It is a good time to be a music lover. It is a bright future that
                faces us in the inevitable demise of the mindless crap we have been  
                subjected to for so many years. It will not be easy or immediate, but
                nothing of quality ever is. Thank you Napster.  
                
                note:  Lucas T. Hanback is one
                wordy son of a bitch. But he's also a marine. So if you disagree
                with him on any of the above stuff, there's a chance he will
                come to your house and kill you. Lucas gave -RoG- a
                choice, "hang from your testicles or put this article up on
                your site". -RoG- believes he has chosen wisely. 
                
               |