The Daily Blabber Blog

  • Search the blog

in-which-i-ponder-the-impact-of-the-pregnant-man-upon-my-life

In Which I Ponder The Impact Of The Pregnant Man Upon My Life.

note: That's not Pregnant Man's new baby daughter in the photo. It's Max Burbank.

Gentle reader, the Pregnant Man has given birth. I suppose this means it is no longer correct to call him the ‘Pregnant Man’, that condition having ended with the birth of his daughter. This makes me sad, as I’d come to love the name ‘Pregnant Man’. It was certainly more pleasing than his actual legal name, Thomas Beatie. For a time, I’d hoped he would legally change his name to ‘Pregnant Man’, and not without reason, as Mr. Beatie is known to be in sympathy with changes in identity. Then I could go on calling him ‘Pregnant Man’ or even ‘The Pregnant Man’ (as in ‘The Batman’). Of course I can call him anything I want; ‘Pregnant Man’, ‘Oprah Fodder’ or ‘Sadie’ which is a name I like. No one can stop me. I’d far rather call him any of those than, say, ‘Mister Mom’. People could just call him Mister Beatie, but we all know they won’t. All that, however, is just so much chin music, and not what I wish to discuss.

Regular readers (and I hope you all are regular) will already know that while genetically a Hebrew, I am by choice a Unitarian. A ‘Jewnitarian’ if you will, a word I have coined and which you must pay me to use. I suppose that’s a vaguely heretical term, but I became a Unitarian precisely because of their tolerance for people who say heretical things. In identifying myself as Unitarian I’m already straying, as I should say I am a Unitarian Universalist, as the two churches merged some time ago. I say phooey on that, not because I have anything particular against Universalists, but because I like saying phooey on things so much I say it on almost everything. And the other UU’s tolerate me saying it, so we’re all good.

As a Unitarian, I am called upon (but not required, because requiring things is a big Unitarian no no) to be ‘Open and affirming’. That’s a term coined by the United Churches of Christ, so we say ‘Welcoming’ instead and don’t have to pay the UCC a penny, but it comes to the same thing. What both terms mean, essentially is that we welcome people who are Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual or transgendered into our community, and I think that’s swell, because after all, UU also welcomes me. With no offense intended to anyone, I will say I can be a hard nut to swallow, and swallow they do. I suggested ‘Swallowing’ instead of ‘Welcoming’ and they tolerated it, so you see why I like us.

Mister Beatie pushes the envelope of transgendered some in that he’s tranced to somewhere in the middle, having given birth and all. That is certainly not my problem. If people knew all the things in my head (or yours, and you know which of you I’m talking to), they’d find my envelope pushed all out of shape in any number of ways. It just so happens Mister Beatie chooses to wear his envelope upon his sleeve, or uterus, or whatever. The first of the Seven Unitarian principles is to value the inherent worth and dignity of every person; every person. Including Mister Beatie (and if you’re reading this, it would make me very happy if you would change your name to Pregnant Man), including me.

So I’m open. It’s the affirming part that bothers me. And not just in Mister Beatie’s case. While I’ll admit I do not want to affirm him, I don’t want to affirm you, either, and chances are I’ve never even met you. Far from affirming you, chances are I’d like to say phooey on you because THAT is who I am. Tolerate it. ‘Affirm’ means ‘to support or uphold the validity of’ and fine, you got me. I do. I wish now I hadn’t looked it up as this whole essay is now on thin ice. It just sounds too positive to me is all I’m saying, and I no more wish to uphold the validity of Mister Beatie’s production of a child than I do your overweening commitment to Star Trek in all it’s forms, including ‘Voyager’.

Here’s what I’m saying. If I accept the inherent worth and dignity of all people (and I do, my readership being mostly Circus Folk and Carnies), I shouldn’t, and in fact can’t list them all. Gay, Lesbian, Bi, Transgendered, partially transgendered, partially transgendered with a hook-hand, left handed partially abled gay republican vegans, those bitten by radioactive spiders… all people is all people. That is the entire point. I don’t want to be called upon to single out any category because it feels like saying ‘Yes, even YOU!” Everyone is everyone. Pregnant Man is undeniably part of everyone, and my life is richer because of that fact. Tolerate that. And phooey on you.

58 comments

User avatar

Colonel Flagg on 07/11/2008 3:52 am

Max, it's good to see you pontificating again, my friend! Two comments:

quote - Then I could go on calling him ‘Pregnant Man’ or even ‘The Pregnant Man’ (as in ‘The Batman’).

Don't you mean "The Goddamned Pregnant Man"?

quote - "... your overweening commitment to Star Trek in all it’s forms, including ‘Voyager’."

Ok, but not including "Enterprise" - that show sucked balls.



User avatar

Drunken_Lemur408 on 07/11/2008 4:06 am

Curse you Colonel Flagg, I wished to be first. You shall rue this day and yes I should get to sleep.



User avatar

Terrible-D on 07/11/2008 4:21 am

Good stuff.

I refuse to refer to "Thomas" as a he. Maybe I'm just an asshole. But she's missing three things that all men have(two if we're talking about Lance Armstrong). Now some people might say "it doesn't matter what gender you were born as, but which one you identify as." To that I say nay, nay. I would like to be refered to as "The Mighty Emperor of the Midwest". But just because that's what I want, doesn't mean I get it.



User avatar

Tanuki on 07/11/2008 8:21 am

I honestly have no idea what to say about this.

I do wanna say "good for you" to Mr. Babymaker over there, though. I'm Episcopal, my mother's devout Catholic, so I don't discuss this issue with her.



Guest

Whoa.. (Guest) on 07/11/2008 9:11 am

How.. is it even POSSIBLE for a man to give birth?

Would he not be a man anymore? :S



Guest

Jay-tee (Guest) on 07/11/2008 10:03 am

It's an it.



User avatar

Silver on 07/11/2008 10:46 am

Gosh... I thought we only had gays and lesbians... What's next? Those abominable entities you just mentioned?

While I tolerate most people, I can't hide the fact that several individuals give me the creeps.

We have been screwed.



Guest

Adam-Wan (Guest) on 07/11/2008 11:24 am

erm umm.. hmmm.. kinda at a loss for words. I swore for the longest it was a hoax.. I guess not.



Guest

Ohma (Guest) on 07/11/2008 12:06 pm

Fuck you intolerant shitheads! It's assholes like you who make it so fucking easy for society to screw over transpeople at every fucking opportunity.

"Oh wah wah, he can't be a man because 'he' don't gots no wee wee."

Shove your bullshit in your eyes! It's exactly that fucking attitude that helps assholes feel safe and secure that nobody will care if they rape and kill transmen and women.



Guest

Parout (Guest) on 07/11/2008 12:07 pm

Heh, for school I had to write a ballad, and I chose the pregnant man story. Classic.



Guest

adw (Guest) on 07/11/2008 12:13 pm

Shes is not a man. If i cut off my arms and legs does that make me a snake



User avatar

ther is n0 try on 07/11/2008 12:28 pm

Ohma, is anyone on here talking about going to this womans house and harming her? Keeping her from getting a job? No, everyone is simply saying she is not a man because she isn't. All she did was change her appearance to look more like a man. If she still has her reproductive organs and can still get pregnant, guess what, shes a woman not a pregnant man. Way to get super over defensive about something thats not even offensive.



User avatar

Max Burbank on 07/11/2008 1:19 pm

Author weighing in. I hope it's clear from what I wrote that I am fine with Pregnant Man, at least as fine as I am with everybody else on the planet, which is not so much, but in fairly equal amounts.

As far as what he calls himself and what he is, I've always been a fan of the skunk from 'Bambi', who said "He can call me flower if he wants to."



Guest

twittlie (Guest) on 07/11/2008 1:32 pm

"Way to get super over defensive about something thats not even offensive."

Not offensive?!? You don't think that invalidating someone is offensive?!?

That is exactly the type of mentality that Ohma was talking about, except the murder example was to an extreme. Obviously Max is more of a man than the insecure assholes on this page since he is able to refer to Thomas Beatie as Mister.



User avatar

spleek on 07/11/2008 1:34 pm

hmmmm.....methinks Ohma was inadvertently directed here on his way to www.i-serious.com

if its brought up on this site, we are going to make fun of it, we are going to laugh at it, dare I say......MOCK it! Anything less would be uncivilized and more akin to calling a doughnut a hot dog..........



Guest

twittlie (Guest) on 07/11/2008 1:37 pm

Hey Max,

Thanks for reiterating your point. It's that loss of equality as shown by other commenters that make me feel queasy.



User avatar

ther is n0 try on 07/11/2008 1:43 pm

I'm gettin a little sick and tired of being called an asshole, I have no problem with Mister or Mrs. Beatie or whatever the fuck she he it wants to be called. I'm simply sayin scientifically she is not a man, these are facts not opinions. If I painted myself black and started calling myself an african american man that would be an incorrect statement, as I am not. Same goes for if I took some estrogen pills and got myself a pair of breasts but kept my penis I wouldn't be a woman. Men cannot get pregnant thats a fact of nature. Get over it.



User avatar

Stonedfox on 07/11/2008 2:03 pm

As a young man who discovered the wonders of Unitarian Universalism recently (and also the one member of my family to not be baptised) I must say this article was very reaffirming (hehe) for me, and my choice to became a Unitarian.

And for the record, although "phooey" is a fantastic thing to say to someone/something, I'm a bigger fan of "nuts to you!"



Guest

bertleman (Guest) on 07/11/2008 2:08 pm

wow, Max loves to provoke even he's not trying, and he's not trying here at all, believe me. Nice to know the troll/crank crowd is tuning in to BrandMax.



Guest

AIF (Guest) on 07/11/2008 3:02 pm

The Pregnant Man divides me. While I am okay with the idea of a transman becoming pregnant, especially if his partner is incapable of doing so, I don't know how I feel about him using it as a way to gain his fifteen minutes of fame.

Now, I haven't read much about him. Maybe in all of his interviews he stresses the importance of respecting transgendered people and answering questions for folks and all that good stuff. But I still don't think this is the best publicity transgendered people could be getting.

Let's face it: people still aren't used to gays and lesbians. They won't be used to transpeople for decades to come. And pregnant, male-identified transpeople gracing the cover of every tabloid and becoming a guest on every day-time talk-show? Well, I just don't know if the world will ever be ready for that, frankly.

I was always taught that the best way to get people to like you is not to demand it, but to persuade them through good behavior. Thus, I think if LGBT people (myself being one of them) wish to gain others' acceptance they must strive to behave in ways that the more conservative (read: "...people of the land. The common clay []. You know... morons.") can understand. At least publicly. Then they can gradually work their way up to having a pregnant transman talk about it on Oprah.



User avatar

Max Burbank on 07/11/2008 3:31 pm

Yeah, but I'm still getting out in front of the crowd with Flower



User avatar

Jaimas on 07/11/2008 5:06 pm

Which means frankly you have bigger stones than most of us, dear Max.



Guest

Maxilor (Guest) on 07/11/2008 5:18 pm

I think in this case Max would have the larger ovaries.



Guest

Jay-Tee (Guest) on 07/11/2008 6:00 pm

It's still an it.



User avatar

Protoclown on 07/11/2008 6:14 pm

I called Max "Flower" once and he socked me in the jaw, and then urinated on me.



Guest

Inky (Guest) on 07/11/2008 7:33 pm

He's a man, in my opinion. No breasts, testosterone in the system, etc. But it's true that he'll always be a female. That is, with a vagina and overies.

I pity those who can't wrap their heads around this.

And lastly, "it" refers to bugs and furniture, not human beings..



User avatar

-RoG- on 07/11/2008 7:50 pm

"I called Max "Flower" once and he socked me in the jaw, and then urinated on me."

Proto, did he stand up straight or did he squat when he urinated on you? Your answer just might clear up a LOT of questions that people have about ol' Max.



User avatar

Dungeonbrownies on 07/11/2008 8:26 pm

Iono, imma get myself urinated on for this..
but I liked start trek voyager...
I felt it was fresh and closer to the original,
without being too crazy like the one that ultimately brought the end of the series as we know it.
that and I liked the skintight suits.



Guest

Yo (Guest) on 07/11/2008 8:39 pm

I thought he/she was a guy by birth. Then again, I only saw a glimpse of one interview with him/her on TV.
I don't know what all the fuss is. If he has normal woman organs, what is so weird about him having a baby? It would be much weirder if they tried to generate a baby in his nuts and giving birth through his penis.
THAT would be weird.



User avatar

-RoG- on 07/11/2008 8:45 pm

Dungeonbrownies, Voyager was ok, I've seen enough episodes of it. I obviously prefer the original series and Next Generation though. However, as Colonel Flagg pointed out, Enterprise was just pure suckage. The intro to that show alone let me know just how bad it was going to be before even seeing an actual episode.



Guest

Tom the Bomb (Guest) on 07/11/2008 8:56 pm

I'm the exact opposite of a U.U. then. There are a lot of people devoted to ideologies that I do not except or affirm, like violent racists and people who try to defend pedophilia as just another form of love. There are too many wackos out there *doing stuff* for me to ever convert, Max.
(here comes the part where I'm kidding) Like for instance, I'll give you two examples. There are these two guys name Rog and Protoclown. . .



User avatar

alittlebirdytoldmeso on 07/11/2008 10:09 pm

Hey, if someone cut off their arms and legs and asked to be called a snake, I'd call them a damn snake. Because they showed me whose commited to hapless acts of self-mutilation.



User avatar

Art Vandelay on 07/11/2008 10:23 pm

So a WOMAN who looks like a dude had a baby.

Big whup.



Guest

Gimal (Guest) on 07/12/2008 12:38 am

There was never a pregnant man. It's just a freaky chick who thinks she is a man. Once and always will be a female. Plus if they are putting picks of HER all over the place topless can we get some real chicks with nice boobs on the news not blurred



Guest

Jay-Tee (Guest) on 07/12/2008 3:55 am

It's nipples make me uncomfortable.



Guest

Armless Snake (Guest) on 07/12/2008 11:26 am

Actually, if there had been scientific research done saying that you likely had the brain structure or chromosomes or partial genitals of a snake from birth, if you lived as a snake not just in words but in lifestyle, if it was easily explainable how womb conditions could make a baby part-human and part-snake, if there were numerous historical precedents of human/snake crossover from Native American tribes to Emperors of Rome, if you were diagnosed as a snake by a PhD or MD psychologist who has much more experience on the subject than angry teenagers with comic-book avatars on the internet, and if living as a snake made you comfortable in ways living as a man did not even though you realized that living as a man would be eaiser, then yes, you'd pretty much be a snake.

But then you could not post, because snakes don't post. Sacrifices.

Of course, I've never heard of such a thing, but I'd probably call you a snake anyway becasue I don't need to be rude to people and force my (possibly mistaken, definitely unresearched) view of the world on them. I would call you a snake and realize that no one was forcing me to be friends with you, so it really wouldn't affect me one way or another.



User avatar

Max Burbank on 07/12/2008 12:15 pm

Never watched Enterprise after the Rod Stewart opening.

BUT. Voyager. The captains spirit guide was a salamander. End of conversation.



User avatar

Nick on 07/12/2008 7:36 pm

Technically he isn't a man.



Guest

Shawn_the_Donut (Guest) on 07/13/2008 12:35 am

Let HIM be what HE wants to be. Woman, Man, Snake, what right does everyone else have to judge?
But Max... I am offended. "THE" Batman? Do you call Clark Kent "The" Superman? I think not. It's "Batman" or be damned, I say.

I wanna be a donut...



User avatar

Desert_Screams on 07/13/2008 1:52 am

It's Pat!



User avatar

HowardC on 07/13/2008 2:37 am

This politically correct b.s. is a bunch of crap.

I have no problem with the lady (or man as SHE likes to call herself, which is fine) but the fact of the matter is her insisting that we call her a he is just confusing in this particular instance.

When I first heard of the story I thought "Holy Fucking Crap! The Future is now!" and I had visions of artifical uteri, strange genetic manipulation and basically the movie "Junior" coming to pass. Of course I read on to discover that it was simply a woman that's undergone gender re-certification, which, quite frankly is NOT a pregnant man, but a pregnant post-op transexual.

If she wants us to refer to herself as he I'm fine with it and I can certainly understand that, but when you start selling your image to everyone under the sun as "The (God-Damned) Pregnant Man" you better fucking have been born a man or else you are just spewing falsehoods around.

And just on a tangent I've often found people who get upset when you refer to them as what they are particularly annoying. Just for example, if I call a fat man "fat" and obviously didn't say it in an insulting manner why must he get upset? Did he not know he was fat? Is the truth now too offensive to the populations delicate ears? I don't think so. Probably the ultimate example is the word "retarded." Retarded is not a slurr or slang or an insult, it is a MEDICAL TERM used to describe someone with a undervelopment/defect (in this case a mental one). So why is it we have to call retarded people "special"? I mean if they aren't retarded it's one thing, but if they are, isn't that what we should call them? I could also go into the whole "N word" deal and how this is slang for the word Negro, which is literally Latin for "dark brownish-hue" but some people would get too upset.

My point? Well when we speak we should be free to use whatever words best convey our thoughts to others without censorship and judgement. That doesn't mean that we should talk to people in hurtful ways, but we should keep in mind that there isn't such a thing as a hurtful word. It's how you use a word.

In this particular case, because we are dealing with a medical condition, this individual should NOT be referred to as a man when talking about their pregnancy because that is simply untrue. At this time it is MEDICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a man to carry a child and to call this woman a man simply confuses the issue. Furthermore, he should NOT be offended when someone refers to him as a girl, because, like it or not, he kept his lady parts so the description isn't inaccurate, so long as they aren't using this fact in a hurtful manner.

And in honor of George Carlin himself, if you disagree you can just fuck off!

(Shit, Piss, Fuck, Cunt, CockSucker, MotherFucker, and Tits)



Guest

Fast Eddy (Guest) on 07/13/2008 4:53 am

I agree with HowardC.

Also, i'm morally outraged that anyone is morally outraged about anything occurring on this page.



User avatar

Colonel Flagg on 07/13/2008 11:20 am

Max said:

"BUT. Voyager. The captains spirit guide was a salamander. End of conversation."

But you didn't get this nugget of information until the third (?) episode, while we all knew Enterprise blew at the opening credits.

On the other hand, I'd much rather argue the merits of Star Trek: Voyager than the ethical implications of gender reassignment. It's so much more life-affirming.

(Last off-topic comment for awhile. My apologies.)



User avatar

gr8bishie on 07/13/2008 1:42 pm

I liked that episode of The Simpsons, in which Homer's spirit guide was a coyote who inexplicably had the voice of Johnny Cash.



Guest

Sands (Guest) on 07/13/2008 3:05 pm

Thomas Beatie is a WOMAN. Anyone with half a brain knows that much. She may wish to be a man or believe that she was born one but I have news for her. She is NOT. Furthermore, the fact that she has chosen to engage in the ultimately female act of getting pregant and having a vaginal birth tells me that she is not above embracing her femininity when it suits HER. Any psychiatrist or psychologist who is not concerned about being bullied by a certain left wing segment of society will openly agree with me. I don't care about being politically correct. I care about being truthful and as a medical student, I can unequivocally and factually state that she is a female. Like it or not.



Guest

Croix (Guest) on 07/13/2008 4:49 pm

I don't really care if she's a man or a woman, but I thought it was really bad of her to sell herself to the press like that. I mean, in essence, by going public with all of this, she's basically presenting herself as a freak show. It's really terribly selfish of her to do so. After all, how fucking messed up is his daughter going to be?



Guest

Poop on a Stick (Guest) on 07/13/2008 6:40 pm

Dear Max, I enjoyed the slightly existential take on your religious affiliation. I almost thought it was a complete tangent until finally you somehow managed to tie it in to "Pregnant Man." I was getting a little worried; but, as usual, you showed what an intelligent, underpaid internet writer you are. Still waiting for BRAND MAX BURBANK shit to buy. Until then, make mine BRAND MAX BURBANK!



User avatar

Terrible-D on 07/14/2008 12:29 am

I'm glad that in stating my opinion that I've been labeled an angry, childish rapist/murderer. Some people would say Ms. Beatie deserves my respect for going so far to be comfortable with herself. I ask why? Since when did self mutilation become an acceptable way of dealing with your own personal issues? When the latest bleached blonde gets herself a boob-job to make herself feel better about her apperence, am I supposed to stand up and say, "Congratulations on taking that step, no matter what anyone else thinks"? Should I apologize for having an opinion, even if it contradicts with the popular opinion? Nowhere in my previous post did I refer to Thomas as a freak, sideshow attraction, "it", or an abomination. And nowhere in that post did I insinuate that I was right. I just stated that it was my opinion that she is not, and through no amount of surgery, will ever be a man.
Well, in the spirit of including everyone, here are few more of my opinions that might possible enrage those of you who didn't get a chance:
1. I will not refer to anyone with black skin as an african-american, unless they prove to me with offical documentation that they hold duel citizenship in America and any African nation.(This holds for any nationality or race.)
2. I don't believe in a god (or gods) of anykind. In fact, those people who do believe unquestioningly in there faith and god scare the living shit out of me. Why is it so easy to accept the concept of god, and not, say, vampires?
3.We are all, in some way, hypocrites, insecure, judgemental, and/or assholes. It's just a fact of life. No one is perfect, and if they were, someone would form a lynch mob.
4. Child birth is not a miracle. It's a chemical reaction.
5. If you refer to your pet as your child, you're delusional and should seek help.(I love animals, I've owned dogs my whole life, but I don't need humanize them to make myself feel better.)
6. It's not a tragedy when people die. Young or old, it's a fact of life. Everything that lives, dies. Not to say that it shouldn't affect you when a loved one dies, but it was bound to happen.
7. Unquestioning loyalty to any political party makes you a tool. We all vote for the canidate that thinks most like ourself, assuming that we know jack shit about how the world should work.
If any of you feel left out, please feel free to contact me. I'm sure there's something you and I don't agree on, thus giving me a chance to say(or write) something that will piss you off.



User avatar

Kitsunexus on 07/14/2008 4:27 am

So he's part of me because I want to be a Japanese schoolgirl?



Guest

Tom the Bomb (Guest) on 07/14/2008 11:54 am

Terrible-D, although I believe in God, I still feel that your rant could have used a few angry words about stamp collectors, comic book geeks, goldfish fanciers, and (this one refers to me) people with pet turtles.

See there's a whole bunch of people you missed, T-to-the-D. I hope you try harder next time.



Guest

Joe Cool (Guest) on 07/14/2008 2:32 pm

Hmmm...It is a shame that they did not adopt one of the many children out there who are waiting for a loving home.



Guest

Adam (Guest) on 07/14/2008 4:22 pm

Thomas isn't even a man, never was. It's a woman who had breast reduction surgery, took hormone replacements, and had follicle groth stimulated on her face. She's still a woman, still has a vagina, and is no medical miracle. Once she grows a penis, then she can be a man.



Guest

Sinkyl (Guest) on 07/17/2008 12:57 am

If the sole requirement for gender is the presence of a gender's specified genitalia, then I suppose that victims of genital mutilation, castration, cancer, birth defect and other means are all genderless? Just countless Its incapable and undeserving of the tiniest respect?

Transexuals deserve the respect to called by the pronouns that they feel as proper, so long as they fit in with normal societal boundries. The Pregnant Man, on the other hand, does not. She isn't living her life as a man, she's a lesbian, a lesbian without diginity, and utterly self-absorbed, but a lesbian all the same.

She isn't living her life as she claims she feels is right, she's living her life as a woman, an ugly, boobless woman. A man doesn't get pregnant, a man adopts, a man helps his wife undergo fertility treatments.



Guest

Sinkyl (Guest) on 07/17/2008 1:00 am

Also,a man doesn't purposely appear on Oprah, a man cannot ever appear on Oprah, it has been decreed.



Guest

Chiya (Guest) on 07/18/2008 4:59 pm

His children are going to probably get bullied, but as long as he's a good fmother (father/mother) then I don't see any problem with it. It's just kind of...gross.

('course I used to think gay people were gross but that was silly and I know some gay people and they're awesome.)



Guest

Chiya (Guest) on 07/18/2008 5:01 pm

PS: you have an ad on your website that doesn't like my computer and my computer doesn't like. So I probably won't be back, but just wanted to say your blog looks neat.

I found it from watching The Guild on youtube.



Guest

Adam-Wan (Guest) on 07/18/2008 11:36 pm

Abomination... no offense but the "shim's" kid is going to grow up miserable. I mean if you fell the need to be some bizarre sexual hybrid, we do live in America and you have that freedom, then cool do whatever. But bringing in a child into such an odd situation is unfair to the kid,, we all know how mean little kids cam be.



User avatar

greenimp on 07/20/2008 7:33 am

well, (kiddies, please dont google anything you see in my posts you dont understand[at least not while your parents are home anywayz]) seeing as last i heard he has no vagina, i have a vital question... how did the baby come out? please tell me it waz zuzarian otherwise i might have nightmares and glance fearfully down at my genitalia from time to time



Leave a Reply

Available BBCode: [b] = bold, [i] = italics, [u] = underline,
[img] = insert image, [url] = insert hyperlink. See the full list.

Previous post: Ice Breakers PACS.
Next post: Bad Band Name Trends.